
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| FREE NEWSLETTER | |
|
Back Issues of SHUSTERMAN'S IMMIGRATION UPDATE
Volume Ten, Number One
SHUSTERMAN'S IMMIGRATION UPDATE is the most popular e-mail newsletter regarding U.S. immigration laws and procedures with over 43,000 subscribers located in more than 120 countries.
Published by the Law Offices of Carl Shusterman, 600 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1550, Los Angeles, California, 90017. Phone: (213) 623-4592 X0
To subscribe, type in your name and e-mail address at http://shusterman.com/subscribe.html#subscribe and click on "Subscribe".
To unsubscribe, type in your e-mail address at http://shusterman.com/subscribe.html#unsubscribe and click on "Unsubscribe".
Disclaimer: This newsletter is not intended to establish an attorney- client relationship. All information contained in this newsletter is generalized. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.
1. PERM: New Rules for Immigrating through Employment
2. Official Immigration Government Processing Times
3. Legislation: President Signs M.D., H/L and 9/11 Bills
4. Some EB-3 Numbers Backlog: How Will This Affect You?
5. Immigration Trivia Quiz: America's Gatekeepers
6. Protection Against "Aging-Out" Under the PATRIOT Act
7. Employment Based Immigration: Success Stories
8. Schedule of Upcoming Immigration Law Seminars
9. Chat Schedule, Transcripts, Audios & Videos
10. Winner of the December 2004 Immigration Trivia Quiz
What if you are an employer who has filed one or more of the 300,000+ applications for labor certification which are currently pending? Can these pending applications be changed to PERM without losing their priority dates? Yes, if you do so within 210 days after withdrawing your labor certification application, and you meet the following three conditions: (1) no job order has been placed with the SWA; (2) the job offer is identical; and (3) you meet all PERM-related recruitment and advertising requirements.
PERM will allow employers to submit an Application for Permanent Employment Certification (ETA-9089) directly with DOL, online if they wish, and receive an approval within 45 to 60 days if there is no DOL audit.
The ETA-9089 is essentially an attestation which requires the employer to check "Yes" or "No" to a series of questions, and to describe the job and specific skills or other requirements. The PERM page on the DOL web site will include detailed instructions to assist employers in completing the form. Employers will be able to enter the PERM web page by using a password. The online system will remember the employer's information (e.g., name, address, etc.) so that on future applications, this information will be entered automatically, and the employer will only have to enter information specific to a particular application.
The employer need not submit any supporting documentation with the form, but must maintain and supply such documentation if required by the Certifying Officer. The standards for reviewing such applications remain the same as under the current labor certification process: (1) Has the employer met the procedural requirements of the regulations?; (2) Are there insufficient U.S. workers who are able, willing, qualified and available?; and (3) Will the employment of the alien have an adverse effect on the wages and working conditions of U.S. workers similarly employed?
DOL will audit certain PERM applications according to criteria developed to identify problematic applications. As a quality control measure, DOL will also conduct random audits.
Once DOL certifies an ETA-9089 and returns it to the employer, the employer must immediately sign the application and submit it in support of an immigration visa petition (I-140) to the DHS.
The State Workforce Agencies (SWAs) will largely be removed from the process although employers must still obtain a Prevailing Wage Determination (PWD) from the SWA before submitting form ETA-9089 to DOL. Employers will be required to pay 100% rather than 95% of the prevailing wage. In addition, the government will offer a four-level wage system in place of the current two-level system.
As is presently the case with RIR labor certifications, PERM will require employers to recruit for the job BEFORE filing their applications. They must place a job order with the SWA and run two Sunday newspaper advertisements. If the application is for a professional occupation, the employer must conduct three additional steps from a list found in the regulation.
There is no processing fee, and this regulation does not specify what the penalties will be for failure to comply with PERM. Penalties will be enumerated in a subsequent regulation. If DOL denies a labor certification, the employer may appeal the denial to BALCA. DOL may, instead of denying an application, order supervised recruitment for the job opportunity.
Ironically, the biggest advantage of PERM, which is speed in processing, comes too late to help employers obtain permanent residence for most Chinese, Indian and Filipino workers in an expedited fashion since the EB-3 category for persons born in these countries will regress three years starting on January 1, 2005. However, for workers born in other countries, and for EB-2 employees, PERM holds great promise.
It remains to be seen what effect PERM will have on the Visa Bulletin and on green card processing. It is possible that the ease with which an application for labor certification may be filed under PERM may result in DOL and CIS being inundated with a huge volume of new cases. This, however, is the subject for a future newsletter.
The regulations are voluminous, 322 pages in all. To simplify the process of locating specific portions of the regulations, below are the major subject headings and pages on which they appear in the December 23 version:
| Page | Subject Heading |
|---|---|
| 2 | SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION I. Introduction II. Statutory Standard |
| 3 | III. Current DOL Regulations |
| 4 | IV. Overview of Regulations |
| 13 | V. Discussion of Comments on Proposed Rule A. Fraud, Program Abuse, and Non-Meritorious Applications |
| 14 | 1. Concerns about Fraud, Program Abuse and Non-Meritorious Applications |
| 16 | 2. Proposals for a Two-Tier System |
| 20 | B. Role of State Workforce Agencies 1.Loss of SWA Expertise |
| 22 | 2. Job Bank Orders |
| 23 | C. Definitions, for Purposes of this Part, of
Terms Used in this Part 1. Definition of the Area of Intended Employment |
| 26 | 2. Definition of the Employer and Employment |
| 27 | 3. References to the INS 4. Definition of the SVP and Educational Equivalents |
| 29 | 5. Definition of the SESA |
| 30 | D. Electronic Filing of Applications 1. Electronic Filing |
| 32 | 2. Elimination of PWD Form |
| 33 | 3. Multiple Beneficiaries 4. Assistance in Completing the Application Form 5. Recommended Changes to the Application Form |
| 35 | E. Schedule A 1. Nurses |
| 40 | 2. Performing Artists 3. Expansion of Schedule A |
| 44 | 4. PWD Requirement |
| 46 | 5. Technical Correction F. Elimination of Schedule B |
| 47 | G. General Instructions 1. Financial Involvement 2. Representation a. Attorneys and Agents |
| 48 | b. Form G-28 |
| 49 | c. Retention of Documents by Attorney |
| 50 | 3. Attestations |
| 51 | 4. Notice a. Expansion of Notice Requirement |
| 54 | b. Notice for Schedule A Applications |
| 55 | c. Wage Range and Inclusion of Wage in Notice |
| 56 | 5. Timing and Duration of Notice |
| 57 | a. When the Notice Must Be Provided b. Duration of the Notice |
| 58 | 6. Notice to Certified Collective Bargaining Representative |
| 60 | 7. Inclusion of Posting Requirements in Recruitment Advertisement |
| 61 | 8. Retention of Documents |
| 62 | H. Fees |
| 63 | I. Labor Certification Applications for Sch. A. Occupations 1. Filing Requirements 2. Documentation Requirements for Nurses |
| 64 | 3. Documentation Requirements for Aliens of
Exceptional Ability J. Labor Certification Requirements for Sheepherders K. Basic Process 1. Filing Applications |
| 66 | 2. Processing 3. Filing Date and Refiling of Pending Cases to New System a. Filing Date |
| 67 | (1) Possible Reinstatement of Section 245(i) |
| 68 | (2) PWD Requirement |
| 69 | b. Refiling of Pending Cases in New System (1) Identical Job Opportunity |
| 70 | (2) Withdrawing and Refiling Cases |
| 72 | (3) Test of the Labor Market |
| 73 | (4) Transition to the New System |
| 74 | (5) Priority in Processing Applications |
| 76 | 4. Pre-Filing Recruitment Requirements |
| 77 | a. Job Order and Two Print Advertisements (1) Job Order |
| 78 | (2) Newspaper Advertisements |
| 82 | (3) Professional Journals |
| 83 | b. Additional Recruitment Steps for Professional Occupations |
| 86 | c. Recruitment for Occupations in Appendix A
to the Preamble (1) Definition of professional and nonprofessional occupations |
| 88 | (2) Presumptions and Preferences |
| 91 | (3) Recruiting Advertising Requirements |
| 92 | 5. Required Advertisement Contents a. Level of Specificity |
| 95 | b. Advertisement Cost |
| 96 | c. Wage Offer in the Advertisement |
| 98 | d. Employer's Name in the Advertisement |
| 99 | e. Placement of Advertisement in Newspaper |
| 100 | f. Inclusion of Physical Address in the Advertisement g. Inclusion of Posting Requirements in One Advertisement |
| 101 | 6. Recruitment Report a. Concerns About Preparing Recruitment Report |
| 106 | b. Job Qualification Through Reasonable Period of On-the-Job Training |
| 109 | 7. Job Requirements a. Business Necessity Standard and Job Duties |
| 112 | b. Foreign Language Requirement |
| 114 | c. Combination Occupations |
| 115 | 8. Alternative Experience Requirements |
| 119 | 9. Actual Minimum Requirements |
| 121 | a. Dissimilar Jobs |
| 122 | b. Infeasibility to Train c. Definition of Employer |
| 124 | 10. Layoffs by the Employer a. Industry and Statewide Layoffs |
| 125 | b. Knowledge of Layoffs c. Laid-off U.S. Workers |
| 126 | d. Contract Workers |
| 127 | e. Definition of Related Occupations |
| 129 | f. Definition of Layoff 11. Alien Influence and Control over the Job a. Number of Employees |
| 130 | b. Familial Relationship Between Alien and Employer |
| 131 | c. Ability to Pay the Salary for the Position |
| 132 | 12. Multiple-Beneficiary and National Applications a. Multiple-Beneficiary Applications |
| 133 | b. National Applications |
| 134 | I. Optional Special Recruitment and Documentation Procedures for College and University Teachers |
| 135 | 1. Expansion of the Optional Recruitment
Procedures to Include Additional Occupations a. Inclusion of High-Level Positions b. Inclusion of Primary and Secondary School Teachers |
| 139 | M. Live-in Household Domestic Service Workers 1. Modifications to the Proposed Rule |
| 140 | 2. Oversight and Audit of Domestic Service
Worker Applications 3. One (1) Year Experience Requirement |
| 141 | N. Audit Letters |
| 142 | 1. Elimination of NOFs and Contents of the Audit Letter |
| 144 | 2. Criteria for Audits |
| 146 | 3. Sending and Responding to the Audit Letter |
| 148 | 4. Extensions 5. Penalties for Failure to Respond Timely to the Audit Letter |
| 150 | O. Supervised Recruitment |
| 151 | 1. Criteria for Requiring Supervised Recruitment |
| 152 | 2. Resources of the Certifying Officer |
| 153 | 3. Knowledge of the Certifying Officer |
| 154 | 4. Supervised Recruitment Process |
| 156 | 5. Technical Correction P. Labor Certification Determinations 1. Referral of Applications to the Division of Foreign Labor Certification |
| 157 | 2. Comments on Determination Process a. Able and Qualified U.S. Workers b. Time to File Requests for Review and Reconsideration |
| 158 | c. Submittal of New Information in
Reconsideration Requests d. Material Misrepresentation |
| 160 | Q. BALCA Review, Consideration and Decision Process 1. Technical Changes 2. Comments on Proposed Rule a. Elimination of Records |
| 162 | b. Time Allowed to File Request for Review |
| 163 | c. Only Employer Can Request Review d. Debarment of Employers R. Validity of and Invalidation of Labor Certification: Substitution of Alien Beneficiaries and Issuance of Duplicate Labor Certifications 1. Substitution of Alien Beneficiaries |
| 165 | 2. Issuance of Duplicate Labor Certifications S. Labor Certification Applications Involving Fraud or Willful Misrepresentation |
| 167 | T. Revocation of Approved Labor Certifications |
| 168 | 1. Criteria for Revoking Labor Certifications |
| 169 | 2. Time Limit for Revocation 3. Consultation with National Certifying Officer |
| 170 | U. Prevailing Wages 1. Application Process |
| 171 | 2. PWD Response Time |
| 172 | 3. Validity Period of PWD |
| 173 | 4 Collective Bargaining Agreement, Davis-Bacon Act, and Service Contract Act |
| 176 | 5. Elimination of 5 Percent Variance |
| 178 | 6. Skill Levels in PWDs a. Number of Skill Levels |
| 179 | b. Inconsistency among SWAs in Assigning Skill Levels c. Academic Institutions |
| 180 | 7. Employer-Provided Wage Data |
| 186 | 8. Use of Median 9. Definition of Similarly Employed |
| 188 | 10. Transition of H-1B Workers from Inexperienced to Experienced |
| 194 | 11. Submission of Supplemental Information |
| 196 | 12. Prevailing Wages for Certain Academic, Nonprofit and Research Entities |
| 198 | 13. Role of the SWA in the PW Process |
| 199 | 14. Occupational Wage Library 15. Technical Correction |
| 200 | 16. Miscellaneous Matters |
| 202 | V. CO Review of PWDs |
The complete text of the final rule begins on page 219.
The new PERM system promises to be challenging for both employers and attorneys as well as for the government. The learning curve will be enormous. In addition, some employers will, no doubt, be tempted to cut corners and not fully comply with the new rules hoping that they will not be audited by DOL. Having been intimately involved in the attestation process for health care providers in the 1990s, I can assure them that if they are audited, DOL will fully investigate them. If their applications contain willful and materials misrepresentations, DOL will impose substantial fines and perhaps debar them from further participation in the PERM program.
The PERM regulations stipulate that DOL will answer your e-mail questions about the new system and establish an online FAQ. Address your questions to PERM.DFLC@dol.gov and, as soon as it is posted online, we link to the PERM FAQ from
The Immigration Service (CIS) lists its processing times for immigration petitions and applications on their web site.
Most immigration applications and petitions must be submitted to one of the following USCIS Service Centers: (1) Laguna Niguel, California; (2) Lincoln, Nebraska; (3) Mesquite, Texas; and (4) St. Albans, Vermont and (5) the National Benefits Center in Missouri.
These service centers periodically issue lists of their processing times for various types of petitions and applications. We link to the latest list issued by each service center.
Warning: Processing times may appear faster on the official lists than they are in reality.
To see how fast (or slow) your service center is processing a particular type of petition or application, see our Government Processing Times Page at
The AAO's most recent published processing times (December 20, 2004) may be found at
To check the Official Processing Times of your Department of Labor Regional Office and your State Workforce Agency (SWA), see
The State Department web site contains a "Visa Wait List" page which permits readers to choose a particular U.S. consular post and learn how long it takes the post to process temporary, nonimmigrant visas. See
We link to a FAQ on the new law (Public Law 108-447) which includes links to both the complete text and summaries of the H-1B and L laws, and to CIS Press Releases on both laws from our "Immigration Legislation" page at
The new law also incorporates the "Homeland Security Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Protection Act of 2004" (S. 2536/H.R. 5182) which provides specific statutory support for the work of the Officer for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, Privacy Officer, and Inspector General at DHS. Read more about this section of the law at
Three days later, on December 11, the Associated Press ran an article about how this development would adversely affect the immigration of nurses to the U.S. The article ran in over 100 newspapers in several different countries. You can read the article on the MSNBC web site at
Even though approximately one million people immigrate to the U.S. in a typical year, 60 percent of the total is "immediate relatives" of U.S. citizens, primarily their spouses, children and parents. Other persons immigrate through the visa lottery, as asylees and refugees and in a variety of categories. Most of the remaining persons immigrate through the numerically-limited "preference" system.
With some variation, the preference system allows 226,000 close family members of U.S. citizens and permanent residents to immigrate annually, and 140,000 persons including their families to immigrate through offers of employment and investments. Persons born in a particular country cannot comprise more than 7% of the family-based or the employment-based quotas.
Whenever there are more green card approvals for a particular category and country of chargeability (usually one's country of birth) than there are available green cards, the State Department adjusts the Visa Bulletin so that the annual numerical limitation for a category and a country cannot be exceeded during the fiscal year.
In the case of the EB-3 category, a priority date is usually established when the State Workforce Agency receives an Application for Alien Labor Certification. However, certain categories (e.g., Persons of Extraordinary Ability, Outstanding Researchers and Professors, etc.) and specific occupations (i.e., Registered Nurses and Physical Therapists) are exempt from the labor certification requirement. Their priority date is the date when their Immigrant Visa Petition (I-140) is received by the CIS.
In most states, it takes approximately two years for an application for a labor certification to be approved and another two years for an application for adjustment of status to be approved, a total of four years. Since EB-3 priority date for persons born in India, China and the Philippines is regressing "only" three years, anyone born in one of these countries who is in possession of an approved labor certification, and whose application for adjustment of status is pending, will not be affected by the coming backlogs. Why? Because the DOL and CIS processing times are slower than the new three-year backlog.
However, if the person's adjustment application has yet to be filed, starting on January 1, 2005, he will not be able to submit his I-485 unless his priority date is before January 1, 2002. He should continue to extend his temporary status, and once his labor certification is approved, have his employer submit an immigrant visa petition (I-140) on his behalf. The new backlogs may add a year or more to his total waiting time for a green card.
Persons born in one of the impacted countries in EB-3 jobs who have not yet started the labor certification process may also have to wait an extra year or so to obtain permanent residence. Will PERM help these people? Not really. Applicants will not be able to apply to adjust their status, or to obtain immigrant visas abroad, for three years no matter how rapidly their PERM applications are processed. This is because their priority dates must be current (no backlog) in order for them to apply for adjustment of status or for immigrant visas.
Registered nurses and physical therapists, being exempt from the labor certification requirement, will feel the effects of the backlogs much more than persons in other occupations. Why? Because they are exempt from the labor certification requirement.
Physical therapists are more fortunate than nurses. They can work in the U.S. in H-1B status (if they apply while there are H-1B numbers available - starting April 1, 2005). Their employers will file an I-140s on their behalf, and approximately three years later, they may apply for green cards.
Nurses are not usually eligible for temporary working status unless they have already applied for adjustment of status. If they have, they should not expect to obtain permanent residence in less than three years. If they have yet to apply for adjustment of status before the end of 2004, they should have their employers submit I-140s on their behalf, and return home for the next three years to await their immigrant visa interviews. Nurses who reside abroad and have already been petitioned by U.S. employers should not expect to be interviewed for green cards until their priority dates are, at least, three years old.
Imagine that you are an RN born in the Philippines, India or China whose I-485 is currently pending. The CIS sends you a letter asking for your VisaScreen certificate. The problem is that you failed to pass the English test and you still do not have a VisaScreen certificate. The CIS denies your application for adjustment of status. What do you do? Currently, you may simply re-file your adjustment application under section 245(k) of the law.
However, what if your denial occur until January? You will be ineligible to adjust your status under 245(k) because your priority date is not current. Unless you qualify under section 245(i), or you have a priority date before January 1, 2002 (very unlikely!), you better book a ticket back to Manila, Delhi or Shanghai. You will not be able to return to the USA until 2007 or 2008.
If you were not born in one of the three affected countries, stop worrying, the new backlogs do not apply to you.
Even if you were born in one of the three backlogged countries, if your spouse was not, you can use your spouse's country of birth to escape the consequences of the new backlogs.
Any solution depends on Congress passing a new law to assist U.S. employers who cannot obtain permanent residence for needed workers. Here are a few suggestions:
Who headed these Cabinet departments in the first Bush Administration, and who are their designated replacements?
The first person to correctly answer this month's quiz and provide biographical information about him or herself will win a free legal consultation during the month of January.
This month's Immigration Trivia Quiz is located at
CSPA prevents many children from aging-out and allows them to immigrate with their parents to the U.S. However, CSPA does not cure all ills. Generally, it is not retroactive. Also, despite the protections in CSPA, some children still age-out, sometimes by just a few days or weeks.
This is where Section 424 of the PATRIOT Act, which was passed in the wake of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, sometimes comes to the rescue.
A simple example illustrates where the PATRIOT Act may save the day for you or your child.
Imagine that you immigrated through employment. Your labor certification was submitted in 2000. On September 1, 2001, a week after your labor certification was approved, your employer submitted an I-140 visa petition for you. The INS approved the I-140 on October 1, 2001. Later in October 2001, you, your spouse and your son all applied for adjustment of status. Although, the Immigration Service approved the adjustment applications of you and your spouse, on August 1, 2002, it denied your son's application stating that he had aged-out because he reached the age of 21 on July 22, 2002.
CSPA won't help your son in this scenario. Why not? Generally, CSPA is not retroactive. Since your son's application for adjustment of status was denied a few days before the effective date of CSPA, its benefits do not apply to him.
However, Section 424 of the PATRIOT Act will help. This section of the law provides that "in the case of an alien...(2) whose 21st birthday occurs after September 2001, and who is the beneficiary of a petition or application filed under such Act on or before September 11, 2001, the alien shall be considered to be a child for 45 days after the alien's 21st birthday for purposes of adjudicating such petition or application."
Here, your son's 21st birthday occurred on July 22, 2002, months after September 2001 and he is the beneficiary of an adjustment application submitted 10 days before September 11, 2001. Section 424 of the PATRIOT Act allows him to be considered a child for immigration purposes for 45 days after his 21st on July 22, 2002. Therefore, when the INS denied his application on August 1, 2002, he was still a child and entitled to adjust his status. The denial was in error.
Although the 30-day limit to submit a Motion to Reconsider this erroneous denial has long since passed, your son (or his attorney) should consider requesting the CIS to reconsider the denial on their own motion.
In other circumstances, the PATRIOT Act works in conjunction with CSPA in preventing children from aging out.
We link to the complete text of Section 424 of the PATRIOT Act as well as CSPA and government memos interpreting the aging-out provisions of both laws from our "Green Card" page at
In December, we submitted over 100 applications for adjustment of status for registered nurses born in the Philippines, India and mainland-China. As we reported in our previous newsletter, these applications had to be received by the CIS by the end of December 2004 because as of January 1, 2005, the employment-based third category (professionals and skilled workers) for persons born in these three countries will regress three years to January 1, 2002.
An Associated Press article about the coming backlogs which quoted me, a nurse who we represent and the Vice President of a local hospital ran, on December 11, in over 100 newspapers around the world including the New York Times, the Boston Globe, the Miami Herald, the Guardian in London, the Manila Bulletin and several newspapers in India.
Among the 100 nurses whose cases we submitted, there were a lot of dramatic last-minute made-for-Christmas stories. One of the best, concerns a nurse who was not able to submit her application in December. She is a Filipina nurse who was scheduled to take the NCLEX during the final week of December. This meant that her results would not be available until January 2005, too late for her to qualify by the deadline. Several other law firms had rejected her case.
However, checking through her legal consultation form which she completed online at http://shusterman.com/intake.html , I noticed that although she was Filipino, she was actually born in Vietnam, and taken by her parents to the Philippines at an early age. Since, for purposes of country "chargeability", her country of birth, not her country of citizenship, controls, she is considered to be Vietnamese.
Since she was not chargeable to the Philippines, she is not subject to the regression in the EB-3 category, and we can safely submit her application, and that of her husband, despite his birth in the Philippines, in January 2005.
Her husband also qualifies under the Vietnamese quota using the "alternate chargeability" provisions of section 202(b)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
Kaplan Learning Center (Kaplan, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of The Washington Post Company, is one of the nation's premier providers of educational and career services for individuals, schools and businesses.)
My topic will be "Recent Changes in Immigration Laws and Procedures for Foreign-Born Physicians and Registered Nurses."
The seminar is free, but space is limited. To reserve, call Kathy Brooks at (626) 584-0222.
Kaplan is located at 251 So. Lake Avenue, 1st Floor, Pasadena, California.
National Asian Pacific American Conference on Law and Public Policy
Harvard Law School
I will be on an immigration panel with Bill Ong Hing, Esq. from San Francisco and Tracy Hong, Esq. from the American Immigration Law Foundation.
Program and registration information will be posted online soon at
Recruiting 2005 Conference and Expo - Las Vegas Hilton
For program and registration information, please see
Links to the transcripts of all of our chats are posted online on our "Chat" page at
We link to selected audio programs regarding immigration produced by National Public Radio at
I'm an ardent reader of your newsletter and a frequent visitor to your website. I've been trying your quizzes for quite some time. I had "won" on several occasions, but I guess I wasn't quick enough.Then we received a second message from Vic:This month was tough!! I could only come up with one other link that provides a list of "targeted areas" for EB-5 investor visas.
http://www.state.nj.us/njbiz/y_cert_target.shtml (NJ) A little research led me to learn that the individual states Department of Commerce decides on these areas. I started visiting all the states commerce departments and started plugging in keywords:Target area of high unemployment
Investor visa, EB-5
Federal Investor Visa Program
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) §203(b)(5)TO NO AVAIL!! Except for NJ.
I live in IL and have been in the US some 14 years and would definitely like to meet Mr. Shusterman. Thank you.
~ Vic M.
Here we go, after a day and a half of intense research.And then, we received his third, and final message:
http://www.labor.state.ny.us/working_ny/finding_a_job/career/immigrat.htm (Link is no longer operational.) I previously provide NJ (see below).There is a very, very, very brief mention of Cleveland in this link, I don't know if it qualifies as an "answer".
http://www.city.cleveland.oh.us/government/departments/econdev/CIC_Task_force.html Merry Christmas!!
Wanted to summarize my final entry;And again at:
- http://www.state.nj.us/njbiz/y_cert_target.shtml (NJ)
- http://www.labor.state.ny.us/working_ny/finding_a_job/career/immigrat.htm (NY)
- http://www.edd.ca.gov/cbfederalvisaprog.pdf (Link is no longer operational.)
- http://www.city.cleveland.oh.us/government/departments/econdev/CIC_Task_force.html
Alternatively, one could take the following route;
USCIS defines "Targeted employment area" defined. - In this paragraph, the term "targeted employment area" means, at the time of the investment, a rural area or an area which has experienced high unemployment (of at least 150 percent of the national average rate). "
http://uscis.gov/lpBin/lpext.dll/inserts/slb/slb-1/slb-21/slb-1261?f=templates&fn=document-frame.htm#slb-act203b5 (Link is no longer operational.)
"Targeted employment area" - means an area which, at the time of investment, is a rural area or an area which has experienced unemployment of at least 150 per cent of the national average rate."Congratulations, Vic! You are our winner this month!The US Dept. of Labor at http://uscis.gov/lpBin/lpext.dll/inserts/slb/slb-1/slb-9974/slb-12541/slb-13615?f=templates&fn=document-frame.htm#slb-8c
http://www.bls.gov/lau/home.htm#tables provides information on unemployment rates by state/region/county/city. The current nationwide unemployment rate is 5.4% (Nov. 2004); therefore, any town with 13.5% (Editor's Note: As one of our alert readers pointed out, 150% of the nationwide unemployment rate is 8.1%, not 13.5%.) or more unemployment, qualifies.provides maps for research http://data.bls.gov/map/servlet/map.servlet.MapToolServlet?survey=la&map=state&seasonal=s
December 26, 2004
Carl Shusterman
Certified Specialist in Immigration Law, State Bar of California
Former U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service Trial Attorney (1976-82)
Board of Governors, American Immigration Lawyers Association (1988-97)
Phone: (213) 623-4592 Fax: (213) 623-3720
Law Offices of Carl Shusterman, 600 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1550
Los Angeles, California 90017
Family values do not stop at the Rio Grande River, is what I used to tell the people of my state. People are coming to put food on the table, they're doing jobs Americans will not do.
Quick Links:
Back Issues:
http://shusterman.com/newsletterbackissuesusimmigration.html
Chats:
http://shusterman.com/chatsusimmigration.html
Citizenship:
http://shusterman.com/citizenship.html
Forms Download:
http://shusterman.com/formsusimmigration.html
Job Search:
http://shusterman.com/jobsusimmigration.html
Permanent Residence:
http://shusterman.com/greencards.html
Processing Times:
http://shusterman.com/waitingtimesusimmigration.html
Search Our Site:
http://shusterman.com/search_tips.html
Temporary Visas:
http://shusterman.com/temporaryvisas.html
Advertise in Our Newsletter:
mailto:jacob.treger@verizon.net
Contact Us:
http://shusterman.com/e-mail.html
Firm Biography:
http://shusterman.com/ourimmigrationattorneys.html
Schedule a Consultation:
http://shusterman.com/intake.html
Work for Us:
http://shusterman.com/careers.html