Law Offices of Carl Shusterman - US Immigration Law Offices of Carl Shusterman - US Immigration

COURT REGULATIONS CONCERNING
APPEALS AND MOTIONS


Law Offices of Carl Shusterman
600 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1550, Los Angeles, CA 90017
(213) 623-4592 x0
Representing Clients in All 50 States
30 Years of Immigration Law Experience
Return to Homepage
Visa Bulletin US CIS - Infopass Consultation with Immigration Lawyer Carl Shusterman Law Offices of Immigration Lawyer Carl Shusterman US Citizenship and Immigration Services Computer Professionals
shusterman.com Sucess Stories Client - case status access Ask Mr. Shusterman shusterman.com web site You Tube

FREE NEWSLETTER
Learn how to benefit from United States immigration laws and procedures from a former INS Attorney (1976-82) with over 30 years of experience.

SHUSTERMAN'S IMMIGRATION UPDATE is must reading for potential immigrants, employers, human resources managers, immigration attorneys, reporters and policy makers.

Join over 55,000 persons in more than 150 countries in subscribing to our FREE monthly e-mail newsletter.

E-Mail Address:

Your Name:

Related Pages:
* Rescinding an In Absentia Order of Removal (Practice Advisory from AILF, 5-20-02, Amended 9-15-04)
* Protecting Your Client When Prior Counsel Was Ineffective (Practice Advisory from AILF, 4-02)

On April 29, 1996, the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), the agency which manages the Immigration Courts and the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), issued regulations which "streamline motions and appeals practice before the (BIA)". The new regulations substantially diminish the rights of persons under deportation and exclusion proceedings. They became effective on July 1, 1996.

Motions to Reopen/Reconsider

Prior to the regulations, a person who becomes eligible for relief from deportation after an Immigration Judge makes a decision in his case, could request that his hearing be reopened. For example, suppose that the judge denies a person's asylum application, and the applicant appeals the judge's decision to the BIA. While the appeal is pending, the person marries a citizen of the United States and INS verifies the bona fides of the marriage. The person may submit a motion to reopen his case in order to apply for a green card through adjustment of status.

Similarly, let's suppose that after the judge's denial, the federal courts grant an asylum request with facts similar to that of the applicant. The applicant could submit a Motion to Reconsider his case to EOIR in light of the new court decision.

The regulations limit a person to a single motion to reopen and a single motion to reconsider during the entire deportation/exclusion proceedings. Currently, there is no limit to the number of motions that can be filed or time limits on when they may be filed.

The regulations provide that, with three exceptions, a Motion to Reopen must be filed within 90 days of the decision of the Immigration Judge (IJ) or the BIA, on or before September 30, 1996, or whichever is later. The three exceptions involve (1) requests for asylum or withholding of deportation when conditions in the applicant's home country change materially after an administrative decision; (2) in the case of an in absentia hearing, a motion to reopen must be filed within 180 days and the final order must show that the failure to appear was because of exceptional circumstances beyond the control of the applicant; or (3) if the motion is jointly submitted by both the applicant and the INS.

Other Changes

The regulation expands the amount of time to submit a notice of appeal from 10 to 30 days.

The present rule which prohibits appeals of orders in in absentia hearings is retained. In order to challenge a decision in such a hearing, the applicant must file a motion to reopen before the IJ. If the IJ denies the motion, the applicant may appeal the denial to the BIA. In such a case, the applicant has used his one and only motion to reopen his case.

For purposes of relief from deportation for longtime permanent residents (commonly referred to as "212C relief"), the term "lawfully admitted for permanent residence" is defined. One's period of permanent residence ends when there is a final administrative order of exclusion or deportation. This rule was necessary to establish a single nationwide standard regarding this issue.

The 1996 immigration law codified these regulatory changes into law.

Continue...

Schedule A Legal Consultation

Return to U.S. Immigration Courts

Return to Immigration Guide Homepage